Systems and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies are now reviving these types of systems. By lie detection tools analyzed at the edge to a program for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being found in asylum applications. This article explores just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their particular capacity to find the way these devices and to follow their right for coverage.

It also demonstrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering them from being able to view the channels of safeguard. It further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of technologies, by which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects who all are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article argues that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: although they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also produce it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.